Comments on: Rational thinking and Science http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/                                     The conceptual me & myself Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:21:21 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: vishva http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/#comment-90 vishva Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:58:16 +0000 http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/#comment-90 Athiests and Thiests are both sheep, going on the same road, but opposite directions where both leads to nowhere. Athiests and Thiests are both sheep, going on the same road, but opposite directions where both leads to nowhere.

]]> By: vishva http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/#comment-30 vishva Wed, 02 May 2007 21:55:05 +0000 http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/#comment-30 Good theory. Well done. I like that comment. Science is a sort of a religion. When they say there is oxygen in air we believe, and very few does the experiment while the majority believes. Even the method they say and the name they call it; we have to believe because they say. The existence of oxygen is a small little thing. C'mon: There are more occult and more esoteric sides in the new facets of Science. But there is surely a difference between "theories on absolute faith", and the experiments on some extents. Sill, in Science they do a correlation test for a small sample and believe it goes to the infinity. But after some thousands the trend totally changes. The Raleigh Gin curve for radiation of black bodies is a good example. First someone came out with an equation for this that worked well for small temperatures. But went seriously wrong for larger temperatures. Later someone else came out with another equation that worked well for larger temperatures. Finally these two guys Raleigh & Gin combined these two and came up with an extremely long equation that relates the black body radiation maximum wavelength and temperature. Good theory. Well done. I like that comment.
Science is a sort of a religion. When they say there is oxygen in air we believe, and very few does the experiment while the majority believes. Even the method they say and the name they call it; we have to believe because they say.
The existence of oxygen is a small little thing. C’mon: There are more occult and more esoteric sides in the new facets of Science. But there is surely a difference between “theories on absolute faith”, and the experiments on some extents.
Sill, in Science they do a correlation test for a small sample and believe it goes to the infinity. But after some thousands the trend totally changes. The Raleigh Gin curve for radiation of black bodies is a good example. First someone came out with an equation for this that worked well for small temperatures. But went seriously wrong for larger temperatures. Later someone else came out with another equation that worked well for larger temperatures. Finally these two guys Raleigh & Gin combined these two and came up with an extremely long equation that relates the black body radiation maximum wavelength and temperature.

]]> By: freethinker http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/#comment-29 freethinker Wed, 02 May 2007 15:54:12 +0000 http://vishva.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/rational-thinking-and-science/#comment-29 One does not have to see something to believe it exists. Take oxygen for example. We don't see it yet we know its there and science can prove it exists using various lab tests. What is difficult to believe are those theories put forward by philosophers and religionists based on absolute faith. One does not have to see something to believe it exists. Take oxygen for example. We don’t see it yet we know its there and science can prove it exists using various lab tests.

What is difficult to believe are those theories put forward by philosophers and religionists based on absolute faith.

]]>